tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29320675.post2937832479917376538..comments2023-10-30T09:10:39.502-07:00Comments on (insert title here): Brianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06799024060528185282noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29320675.post-86015191144160056932011-02-10T15:11:02.927-08:002011-02-10T15:11:02.927-08:00Yeah, science...
The foundation of Scientology i...Yeah, <i>science</i>... <br /><br />The foundation of Scientology is a thing called Dianetics, which you have to get through to get to the "upper levels" where all the space opera is. But Dianetics is founded on the principle that accumulated "engrams" (a real word that means a real thing though not as Dianetics explains it) have to be dealt with and confronted in order to overcome their adverse consequences. A Dianetic engram ("a record of a moment of pain or painful emotion"), once "cleared" from your "memory bank" (by looking at it directly and reliving the moment it was implanted) no longer has any persuasion on you. So, obviously, you get rid of your engrams and you're a New Being, totally fresh and shiny with no psychosomatic ills or abberations and a perfect memory and on and on and on.<br /><br />Until Hubbard agreed to have his engram idea tested by UCLA (it would be the last time this was ever allowed). The results of which you can see <a href="http://www.xenu.net/archive/lrhbare/lrhbare06.html" rel="nofollow">right over here.</a> <br /><br />The existence of this study - now only really found on the internet - is exactly why Scientologists are told to not go on the internet and some even have programs installed that keep these things out of view. It is considered "enturbulation" - a made-up word that means "this will confuse you and stop you from obtaining real "gains" in your sessions... and "we'll just have to charge you more money to get rid of that crap too."<br /><br />There's no such thing as an engram as Dianetics explains it, doing the things Dianetics (the precursor and foundation of Scientology) says it does to you.<br /><br />I'd say the science speaks for itself. If you can find it.RWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14416316296228157208noreply@blogger.com