Hmmm...
Maybe it's just the campaign fatigue talking, but I don't see how Al Gore would be objectively worse than any of the front runners in either party. And he would, quite frankly, be very good for (publicly-funded) science in this country.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
As long as you're contributing to the science hegemony.
a nanny stater makes an appeal...
They're all nanny staters, now...
(Dr. Paul excepted, naturally)
Anyway, I think I made my level of enthusiasm pretty clear.
Post a Comment