I also think Barack Obama is a competent executive with whom I have a different set of philosophical differences. And at this point, I find them more palatable, and would likely vote accordingly between the two of them.
But now I'm thinking...fuck that noise. Professor Bainbridge is on to something here:
At the end of the day, however, what likely will tip the scales for me is the sheer entertainment factor. Romney versus Obama will be a snoozefest, mainly because Romney elicits no passion from anybody. Newt versus Barak[sic], however, could be vastly entertaining. Two really smart guys, both of whom are good speakers, and both of whom will be at least affecting being really pissed off at the other and the other's base. If the Newt who tore into John King the other day shows up at the debates, they will be truly great TV. Since I don't think anybody in Washington or running to be in Washington can fix the problems we face, why not vote for the circus?I don't think I could bring myself to vote for Newt--actually the closed caucuses in WA state mean I won't be voting for anybody until the general election anyway--but yeah, at this point, I kind of want to see the show.
1 comment:
i just want the economy to get better for folks like me.
it wont happen with the guy who's in office now.
i tend to favor Romney, if only because he understands how economies work, instead of how he thinks they should work.
but, any advantge he brings would be nullified if he followed his war rhetoric.
part of me says he doesnt really believe the war rhetoric himself, but still... i dont know.
all i know is that i'm circling the drain here. the status quo wont cut it.
shame on me for not getting a govt job.
Post a Comment